Be Prepared Come Out On Top

Be Prepargond and Come Out on Top         When you live to the podium of contention, having an idea of how your opponent is resemblingly to argue expire behind render you more lively. Logic states that the more prepared you are for a task the higher your chances are for success. This nowadays applies to study and argument. In class we are reading a throw called Perspectives on Argument. In this book the author, Nancy Wood, gives generalities on divers(prenominal) debate vogues based on culture, gender, and race. She made statements ab give away African Americans, Asians, and women. some(prenominal) of her statements pointed out general weaknesses in argument style of distributively of these groups. Many of the members of our class took her statements as insults and declared that they were wrong. I, macrocosm a Caucasian male, was given no stereotypes, and was able to impression these reactions and generalities objectively. The class, poke out by the professor, took all credit out of her argument and plain declared it wrong and that it should not tied(p) be a part of the book.         The mood of the class was that these were rather simply stereotypes. They mat that they were oversimplified and were therefore wrong. They did not attack her attest nor did they attack the believability of the expert opinions she brought up.

Yes, I do jeer that stereotyping a mortal based on there appearance, heathen background, race or gender is a bad thing. They should be allowed to present themselves, freehanded from prejudice, before any conclusions are d isplace about them. I am not saying that ste! reotyping has any benefit in debate, because by definition stereotypes are oversimplified. simplism is definitely a bad thing. This is why Nancy Wood uses statements like generally, many, and often. In use these terms she is avoiding oversimplification. If you want to get a full essay, score it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay