Civil Disobedience Essay example -- Papers Thoreau Laws Morals Essays

Civil DisobedienceWorks Cited Not IncludedI believe that civic disobedience is justified as a rule of trying to change the law. I think that civil disobedience is an expression of ones viewpoints. If someone is willing to break a law for what they believe in, more mogul to them Civil disobedience is defined as, the refusal to imitate the demands or commands of a government or occupying power, without resorting to violence or active measures of opposition (Websters Dictionary). This refusal usually scores the form of peaceable resistance. Its usual purpose is to force concessions from the government or occupying power. Civil disobedience has been a major tactic and philosophy of nationalist movements in Africa and India, in the civil rights movement of U.S. blacks, and of labor and anti-war movements in many countries. hatful practicing civil disobedience break a law because they consider it unjust and hope to call attention to it. In his essay, Civil Disobedience, Ameri can author Henry David Thoreau set forth the basic tenets of civil disobedience for the first time. The independence of India in the 1930s was largely a result of the nonviolent resistance by Mohandas Gandhi to the British colonial laws. In the United States, the nonmilitant efforts of Martin Luther King, Jr., helped bring about civil rights legislation. There are numerous examples that exposit how civil disobedience is justified.In late 1955 Rosa Parks, a leading member of the local branch of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) was jailed for refusing to give up her seat to a white passenger. I dont blame Parks at all for what she did. The African American people had to take a stand on some issue... ...because it is non right to ban a piece of literature no matter how unethical it is. These laws limit tender-hearted freedom and hinder spontaneity.I think there are always times when disobeying a law is morally justified. They are sometim es unfair and repressive common sense, social custom, and religion already provide enough guidance and morality can never be legislated (Kessler 154). Thoreau argued that any given law is not as high or not above what you believe in or what your conscious tells you is right. We all have a moral duty to obey our consciences (Kessler 154). I believe it is very clear how I stand on the subject of civil disobedience. After researching this topic and formulating my own opinions I have well-read a great deal about my morals and myself. It simply shocks me when I think of the accomplishments of people like King, Gandhi, and Thoreau.